<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (11) TMI 58 - ASSAM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181147</link>
    <description>A receipt arising from services rendered in the course of a vocation remains taxable income, even if it was not paid under a remuneration stipulation or was received gratuitously, so the bonus from the co-operative society was taxable and not a casual non-recurring receipt. An earlier addition of concealed business profits did not prevent the department from treating a separate unexplained amount as income from another undisclosed source, so the further credit was upheld on the facts. However, where a cash credit stood in the names of the assessee&#039;s daughter and son-in-law, mere rejection of the explanation was insufficient; absent material showing the money belonged to the assessee, the amount could not be assessed in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (11) TMI 58 - ASSAM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181147</link>
      <description>A receipt arising from services rendered in the course of a vocation remains taxable income, even if it was not paid under a remuneration stipulation or was received gratuitously, so the bonus from the co-operative society was taxable and not a casual non-recurring receipt. An earlier addition of concealed business profits did not prevent the department from treating a separate unexplained amount as income from another undisclosed source, so the further credit was upheld on the facts. However, where a cash credit stood in the names of the assessee&#039;s daughter and son-in-law, mere rejection of the explanation was insufficient; absent material showing the money belonged to the assessee, the amount could not be assessed in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>