https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326168 The Tribunal found that there was no clear finding on the violations committed by the appellant, and the liability to Central Excise duty was not established. Therefore, the order of confiscation was deemed unsustainable, and the matter was remanded to the original authority for further examination of evidence regarding violations and duty liability. The appellants were granted an opportunity to present their case in light of the remand. The appeals were disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326168 The Tribunal found that there was no clear finding on the violations committed by the appellant, and the liability to Central Excise duty was not established. Therefore, the order of confiscation was deemed unsustainable, and the matter was remanded to the original authority for further examination of evidence regarding violations and duty liability. The appellants were granted an opportunity to present their case in light of the remand. The appeals were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326168