<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 275 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326161</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s position, emphasizing that the declared transaction value should be accepted under Section 14 of the Customs Act. It found no valid reason to reject the declared value, as there was no dispute about the payment made. The Tribunal also ruled that confiscation and penalty were unwarranted since there was no misdeclaration regarding the goods&#039; quantity. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal and providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 275 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326161</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s position, emphasizing that the declared transaction value should be accepted under Section 14 of the Customs Act. It found no valid reason to reject the declared value, as there was no dispute about the payment made. The Tribunal also ruled that confiscation and penalty were unwarranted since there was no misdeclaration regarding the goods&#039; quantity. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal and providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>