<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 699 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181143</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The disallowance of Rs. 20,000 from motor car expenses for personal and non-business use was deleted based on precedents and legal judgments. Additionally, the entitlement to investment allowance on a computer microprocessor was allowed following legal precedents. The Court emphasized past judgments and legal interpretations in its decision, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 11:53:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 699 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181143</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The disallowance of Rs. 20,000 from motor car expenses for personal and non-business use was deleted based on precedents and legal judgments. Additionally, the entitlement to investment allowance on a computer microprocessor was allowed following legal precedents. The Court emphasized past judgments and legal interpretations in its decision, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>