<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 764 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181140</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application was allowed, and the case was directed to be fixed before the regular Bench. The issue of disallowance of depreciation on leased assets was set aside to the AO for fresh consideration after reference to the lease agreement terms, AO&#039;s explanation, and a Special Bench decision. The appellant argued that previous decisions allowed depreciation on the same leased assets as operating leases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 764 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181140</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application was allowed, and the case was directed to be fixed before the regular Bench. The issue of disallowance of depreciation on leased assets was set aside to the AO for fresh consideration after reference to the lease agreement terms, AO&#039;s explanation, and a Special Bench decision. The appellant argued that previous decisions allowed depreciation on the same leased assets as operating leases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>