https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181127 Revisional interference against an interlocutory order is limited by the proviso to Section 115 CPC: it is available only where the impugned order, if made in the applicant's favour, would finally dispose of the suit, or where letting it stand would cause failure of justice or irreparable injury. The text states that these conditions were not satisfied, so revisional jurisdiction was unavailable. It also explains that a boycott by counsel does not justify staying judicial proceedings or seeking transfer of the case; an advocate must appear or properly withdraw, and parties cannot secure a different forum by mutual consent to avoid the seized court. en-us Fri, 13 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:06:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181127 Revisional interference against an interlocutory order is limited by the proviso to Section 115 CPC: it is available only where the impugned order, if made in the applicant's favour, would finally dispose of the suit, or where letting it stand would cause failure of justice or irreparable injury. The text states that these conditions were not satisfied, so revisional jurisdiction was unavailable. It also explains that a boycott by counsel does not justify staying judicial proceedings or seeking transfer of the case; an advocate must appear or properly withdraw, and parties cannot secure a different forum by mutual consent to avoid the seized court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181127