<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1412 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, specifically regarding the conditional addition in the computation of income. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds, including penalty proceedings initiation, charging of interest under Section 234B, deduction under Section 43B for PF and ESI, land survey expenditure, and difference in valuation of land as unexplained investment. The order was pronounced on 21/01/2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:51:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1412 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, specifically regarding the conditional addition in the computation of income. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds, including penalty proceedings initiation, charging of interest under Section 234B, deduction under Section 43B for PF and ESI, land survey expenditure, and difference in valuation of land as unexplained investment. The order was pronounced on 21/01/2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>