<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 991 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision, denying the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 54 of the IT Act for the properties in question. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence of residential structures and deemed the claimed development charges improbable. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that the assessee is not entitled to the exemption sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:43:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 991 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision, denying the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 54 of the IT Act for the properties in question. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence of residential structures and deemed the claimed development charges improbable. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that the assessee is not entitled to the exemption sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>