<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1175 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the deletion of depreciation addition under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that depreciation is a legitimate deduction in computing the assessee&#039;s real income, in line with precedents set by the Bombay High Court and the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court. The decision emphasized that claiming both capital expenditure and depreciation would amount to double deduction, as established in relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:26:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1175 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the deletion of depreciation addition under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that depreciation is a legitimate deduction in computing the assessee&#039;s real income, in line with precedents set by the Bombay High Court and the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court. The decision emphasized that claiming both capital expenditure and depreciation would amount to double deduction, as established in relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>