<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1095 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181098</link>
    <description>SC upheld the HC&#039;s reversal of the trial court&#039;s acquittal and convicted the appellants for murder and related offences, sentencing them to life imprisonment. The court found presence of the accused at the scene proved by multiple ocular witnesses and corroborative PCR/phone evidence, adverse conduct and disclosures by an accused, and reliable witness testimony connecting vehicles and cartridges to the offenders. Ambiguous lab reports and delayed statements did not undermine the cogent evidence. Non-disclosure by the prosecution did not cause irremediable prejudice. The SC cautioned media against trial by publicity and condemned disparaging judicial remarks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1095 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181098</link>
      <description>SC upheld the HC&#039;s reversal of the trial court&#039;s acquittal and convicted the appellants for murder and related offences, sentencing them to life imprisonment. The court found presence of the accused at the scene proved by multiple ocular witnesses and corroborative PCR/phone evidence, adverse conduct and disclosures by an accused, and reliable witness testimony connecting vehicles and cartridges to the offenders. Ambiguous lab reports and delayed statements did not undermine the cogent evidence. Non-disclosure by the prosecution did not cause irremediable prejudice. The SC cautioned media against trial by publicity and condemned disparaging judicial remarks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>