https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181091 The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that questions 1 to 4 were similar to a previous case dismissed that day, and thus could not be entertained. Question 5 was based on a decision of the Court and was not entertained. As question 6 was consequential, it also could not be entertained. The appeal was ultimately dismissed with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2016 18:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181091 The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that questions 1 to 4 were similar to a previous case dismissed that day, and thus could not be entertained. Question 5 was based on a decision of the Court and was not entertained. As question 6 was consequential, it also could not be entertained. The appeal was ultimately dismissed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181091