https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181084 The Supreme Court held that the appellant, as the father of the deceased, had the locus standi to file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. The Court clarified that obtaining leave under sub-Section (3) of Section 378 of the Cr.P.C. was necessary. It criticized the High Court for failing to properly reappreciate the evidence and remanded the case back to the High Court for reconsideration. The High Court was instructed to grant leave for the appeal and dispose of the case in accordance with the law and the Supreme Court's observations. en-us Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181084 The Supreme Court held that the appellant, as the father of the deceased, had the locus standi to file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. The Court clarified that obtaining leave under sub-Section (3) of Section 378 of the Cr.P.C. was necessary. It criticized the High Court for failing to properly reappreciate the evidence and remanded the case back to the High Court for reconsideration. The High Court was instructed to grant leave for the appeal and dispose of the case in accordance with the law and the Supreme Court's observations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181084