<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1163 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181087</link>
    <description>The court held that the notifications retrospectively curtailing the petitioner&#039;s tax exemption period were not valid. The petitioner was entitled to the tax exemption until the originally granted date. The court quashed the notifications and allowed the writ petition with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:23:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1163 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181087</link>
      <description>The court held that the notifications retrospectively curtailing the petitioner&#039;s tax exemption period were not valid. The petitioner was entitled to the tax exemption until the originally granted date. The court quashed the notifications and allowed the writ petition with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>