<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 263 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326149</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the rectification application, emphasizing that new evidence cannot be introduced through the rectification process for a rehearing on merits. The Court found discrepancies in the petitioner&#039;s claims and records, highlighting the importance of full disclosure. Due to the lack of merit in the appeal and the petitioner&#039;s conduct, the Court dismissed the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:20:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 263 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326149</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the rectification application, emphasizing that new evidence cannot be introduced through the rectification process for a rehearing on merits. The Court found discrepancies in the petitioner&#039;s claims and records, highlighting the importance of full disclosure. Due to the lack of merit in the appeal and the petitioner&#039;s conduct, the Court dismissed the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>