<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 261 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326147</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. It held that the deduction under Section 32-AB should be computed on profits before setting off carried forward losses, in accordance with the plain language of the provisions and the Finance Act, 1987 amendment. The Court emphasized the correct interpretation of the provisions and the sequence of allowing deductions and set offs. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 261 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326147</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. It held that the deduction under Section 32-AB should be computed on profits before setting off carried forward losses, in accordance with the plain language of the provisions and the Finance Act, 1987 amendment. The Court emphasized the correct interpretation of the provisions and the sequence of allowing deductions and set offs. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>