<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 259 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326145</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the assessee to claim deduction under Section 80IA without setting off losses/unabsorbed depreciation. The Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the term &#039;initial assessment year&#039; in Section 80IA(5) as the year chosen by the assessee for claiming deduction, not necessarily the year of commencement of the eligible business. The Court emphasized adherence to the Central Board of Direct Taxes&#039; circular clarifications and dismissed the appeal, stressing the importance of following established legal interpretations and avoiding repeated appeals on settled issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 259 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326145</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the assessee to claim deduction under Section 80IA without setting off losses/unabsorbed depreciation. The Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the term &#039;initial assessment year&#039; in Section 80IA(5) as the year chosen by the assessee for claiming deduction, not necessarily the year of commencement of the eligible business. The Court emphasized adherence to the Central Board of Direct Taxes&#039; circular clarifications and dismissed the appeal, stressing the importance of following established legal interpretations and avoiding repeated appeals on settled issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>