<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 248 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326134</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the orders of the lower authorities regarding the computation of capital gains and treatment of agricultural income. Lack of authenticated evidence, discrepancies in documents, and failure to establish the genuineness of claims led to the rejection of the assessee&#039;s contentions. The tribunal found no reason to disturb the findings of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) and upheld their decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:19:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 248 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326134</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the orders of the lower authorities regarding the computation of capital gains and treatment of agricultural income. Lack of authenticated evidence, discrepancies in documents, and failure to establish the genuineness of claims led to the rejection of the assessee&#039;s contentions. The tribunal found no reason to disturb the findings of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) and upheld their decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>