<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 242 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act invalid as it lacked new tangible material and constituted a mere change of opinion. Consequently, the reassessment order was quashed on jurisdictional grounds. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the disallowances made in the reassessment order due to the invalidity of the reopening. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 5.2.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:19:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 242 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act invalid as it lacked new tangible material and constituted a mere change of opinion. Consequently, the reassessment order was quashed on jurisdictional grounds. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the disallowances made in the reassessment order due to the invalidity of the reopening. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 5.2.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>