<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 239 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326125</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeals and associated CMPs due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit order and subsequent dismissal of the appeal. The appellant&#039;s argument of discrimination based on a Mumbai Tribunal decision was rejected, emphasizing the importance of adhering to court orders and timelines. The Court advised the appellant to seek relief through proper channels and approach the Tribunal again for recourse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:15:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 239 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326125</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeals and associated CMPs due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit order and subsequent dismissal of the appeal. The appellant&#039;s argument of discrimination based on a Mumbai Tribunal decision was rejected, emphasizing the importance of adhering to court orders and timelines. The Court advised the appellant to seek relief through proper channels and approach the Tribunal again for recourse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>