<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 238 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326124</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was treated as admissible on service tax paid for employee welfare medical services where the services were connected to business activity and supported discharge of a legal or statutory obligation. The analysis relied on prior decisions recognising that such business-related services can qualify as input service when they have a nexus with output services. A Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate also showed that the medical expenditure had been included in the value of the output services, removing the factual objection raised below. On that basis, the credit was held admissible in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:15:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 238 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326124</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was treated as admissible on service tax paid for employee welfare medical services where the services were connected to business activity and supported discharge of a legal or statutory obligation. The analysis relied on prior decisions recognising that such business-related services can qualify as input service when they have a nexus with output services. A Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate also showed that the medical expenditure had been included in the value of the output services, removing the factual objection raised below. On that basis, the credit was held admissible in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>