<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 236 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326122</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the issues raised had already been addressed in a previous decision by the Tribunal. The Court emphasized the need for consistency in decisions and stated that if a different view was taken by the Apex Court in the future, the matter might need to be reconsidered. The appeal was disposed of based on the earlier decision, highlighting the importance of adherence to established precedents in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 236 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326122</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the issues raised had already been addressed in a previous decision by the Tribunal. The Court emphasized the need for consistency in decisions and stated that if a different view was taken by the Apex Court in the future, the matter might need to be reconsidered. The appeal was disposed of based on the earlier decision, highlighting the importance of adherence to established precedents in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>