<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 231 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326117</link>
    <description>The High Court modified the onerous conditions set by the Commissioner of Customs for the provisional release of goods, directing the release to the Petitioner under revised terms involving a bond and bank guarantee. Despite the Respondent&#039;s argument for an appeal as an alternative remedy, the Court found pursuing statutory remedies impractical due to non-compliance with previous orders. The judgment aimed to provide relief to the Petitioner while keeping all legal rights open for future adjudication proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 231 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326117</link>
      <description>The High Court modified the onerous conditions set by the Commissioner of Customs for the provisional release of goods, directing the release to the Petitioner under revised terms involving a bond and bank guarantee. Despite the Respondent&#039;s argument for an appeal as an alternative remedy, the Court found pursuing statutory remedies impractical due to non-compliance with previous orders. The judgment aimed to provide relief to the Petitioner while keeping all legal rights open for future adjudication proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>