<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 16 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2935</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 175/86-CE is denied only when the goods bear another person&#039;s brand name or trade name that ly indicates a trade connection with that person. The Court found that the hexagonal design printed on the corrugated boxes was not shown to belong to the marketing company: it disowned any proprietary right, there was no agreement or commercial document treating it as its mark, and the appellant&#039;s own brand names were separately displayed. The design was therefore treated as a mere artistic feature, not an identifying mark of another person, and the small scale exemption remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 16 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2935</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 175/86-CE is denied only when the goods bear another person&#039;s brand name or trade name that ly indicates a trade connection with that person. The Court found that the hexagonal design printed on the corrugated boxes was not shown to belong to the marketing company: it disowned any proprietary right, there was no agreement or commercial document treating it as its mark, and the appellant&#039;s own brand names were separately displayed. The design was therefore treated as a mere artistic feature, not an identifying mark of another person, and the small scale exemption remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>