https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326109 The court found that the tender process lacked transparency and fairness, deviating from constitutional requirements. The Public Works Department's favoritism towards the 3rd respondent, who did not meet experience criteria, led to the quashing of the work order. The court emphasized strict adherence to tender terms, annulling the award and allowing a two-week stay for potential appeal. en-us Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326109 The court found that the tender process lacked transparency and fairness, deviating from constitutional requirements. The Public Works Department's favoritism towards the 3rd respondent, who did not meet experience criteria, led to the quashing of the work order. The court emphasized strict adherence to tender terms, annulling the award and allowing a two-week stay for potential appeal. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326109