https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181083 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal dismissed the application for adjournment, citing lack of justification for additional information. Ground No.1 regarding curfew situation was dismissed as it was not raised earlier. The disallowance of expenses was reduced to 25% by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal due to insufficient evidence. The Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication on the application for additional evidence under Rule 46A. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:07:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181083 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal dismissed the application for adjournment, citing lack of justification for additional information. Ground No.1 regarding curfew situation was dismissed as it was not raised earlier. The disallowance of expenses was reduced to 25% by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal due to insufficient evidence. The Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication on the application for additional evidence under Rule 46A. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181083