<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1203 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181076</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, confirming the disallowance of Rs. 2,83,561/- under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS but allowing the claimed business expenses and recognizing only the actual interest received. The decision emphasizes the significance of the real income theory and proper documentation in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1203 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181076</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, confirming the disallowance of Rs. 2,83,561/- under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS but allowing the claimed business expenses and recognizing only the actual interest received. The decision emphasizes the significance of the real income theory and proper documentation in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>