<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 948 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181057</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal regarding the taxation of dividend income on a net basis, the allowance of expenditure on distribution of refreshment coupons to employees, and the treatment of the amount received on termination of the re-insurance division as a capital receipt. The court found that no substantial question of law was involved in these matters, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:03:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 948 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181057</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal regarding the taxation of dividend income on a net basis, the allowance of expenditure on distribution of refreshment coupons to employees, and the treatment of the amount received on termination of the re-insurance division as a capital receipt. The court found that no substantial question of law was involved in these matters, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>