<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 237 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181050</link>
    <description>Entitlement to ryotwari patta depended on lawful and continuous possession, but the finding in favour of the claimants was based in part on additional documents and photostat copies produced for the first time in writ proceedings. Without a clear determination that those materials were admissible as secondary evidence and authentic, the foundation for the finding was unsustainable. Allegations that the original survey and revenue records had been tampered with also required fresh examination of the original records and an opportunity for both sides to prove authenticity. The earlier findings and consequential directions were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision on original evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:20:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 237 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181050</link>
      <description>Entitlement to ryotwari patta depended on lawful and continuous possession, but the finding in favour of the claimants was based in part on additional documents and photostat copies produced for the first time in writ proceedings. Without a clear determination that those materials were admissible as secondary evidence and authentic, the foundation for the finding was unsustainable. Allegations that the original survey and revenue records had been tampered with also required fresh examination of the original records and an opportunity for both sides to prove authenticity. The earlier findings and consequential directions were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision on original evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>