<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1579 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181031</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance under section 14A and directing the AO to restrict the disallowance to 2% of the total exempt income, in accordance with the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court. The decision highlighted the High Court&#039;s binding precedent on estimating disallowances for the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1579 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181031</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance under section 14A and directing the AO to restrict the disallowance to 2% of the total exempt income, in accordance with the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court. The decision highlighted the High Court&#039;s binding precedent on estimating disallowances for the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>