https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2923 The appeals were filed by two companies against the Order-in-Originals confirming demands, interest, and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, and Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The companies were found to have contravened Rule 6(3)(c) by utilizing common input services for both taxable and non-taxable services, exceeding the permissible limit of credit utilization. The Commissioner allowed the appeals and set aside the Orders-in-Originals in all three cases, based on a clear interpretation of the law and the provisions outlined in the judgment, providing relief to the appellants. en-us Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2923 The appeals were filed by two companies against the Order-in-Originals confirming demands, interest, and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, and Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The companies were found to have contravened Rule 6(3)(c) by utilizing common input services for both taxable and non-taxable services, exceeding the permissible limit of credit utilization. The Commissioner allowed the appeals and set aside the Orders-in-Originals in all three cases, based on a clear interpretation of the law and the provisions outlined in the judgment, providing relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2923