<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1097 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181007</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Deputy Commissioner (Assessment)&#039;s jurisdiction to issue notices under section 54 of the U.P. VAT Act. The petitioner was directed to respond to the notices and demonstrate no basis for penalty imposition. The court found no justification for a writ of prohibition or certiorari and made no cost orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1097 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181007</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Deputy Commissioner (Assessment)&#039;s jurisdiction to issue notices under section 54 of the U.P. VAT Act. The petitioner was directed to respond to the notices and demonstrate no basis for penalty imposition. The court found no justification for a writ of prohibition or certiorari and made no cost orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>