https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181010 The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order issued by the respondent in May 2002. The court emphasized the lack of jurisdiction in the respondent's actions due to the absence of enabling provisions for such revisions and the extended time lapse between the inspection and the initiation of proceedings. The judgment favored the petitioner, leading to the closure of any related pending miscellaneous petitions without costs. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:01:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181010 The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order issued by the respondent in May 2002. The court emphasized the lack of jurisdiction in the respondent's actions due to the absence of enabling provisions for such revisions and the extended time lapse between the inspection and the initiation of proceedings. The judgment favored the petitioner, leading to the closure of any related pending miscellaneous petitions without costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181010