<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1152 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181011</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both writ petitions challenging the order and assessment for exemption from entry tax under the Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976. The petitioner&#039;s claim for exemption based on not being a registered dealer under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and not purchasing goods from outside Madhya Pradesh was rejected. The court ruled that the petitioner was liable for entry tax due to purchasing goods from outside the state, despite presenting registration certificates and C forms. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed for lacking merit, without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1152 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181011</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both writ petitions challenging the order and assessment for exemption from entry tax under the Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976. The petitioner&#039;s claim for exemption based on not being a registered dealer under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and not purchasing goods from outside Madhya Pradesh was rejected. The court ruled that the petitioner was liable for entry tax due to purchasing goods from outside the state, despite presenting registration certificates and C forms. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed for lacking merit, without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>