<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1090 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181015</link>
    <description>Under the unamended packing-material provision applicable to the assessment year, separate sale of cement and packing material was legally permissible if supported by the parties&#039; intention and the facts. The invoice separately stated the price of cement and HDPE bags, and in the absence of rebutting material it was treated as reliable evidence of the contractual arrangement. The record also indicated that the bags were not supplied free of cost. On that basis, the transaction was characterised as separate sales rather than a single composite sale, and the later amendment to the schedule was noted as reinforcing statutory recognition of separate treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:01:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1090 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181015</link>
      <description>Under the unamended packing-material provision applicable to the assessment year, separate sale of cement and packing material was legally permissible if supported by the parties&#039; intention and the facts. The invoice separately stated the price of cement and HDPE bags, and in the absence of rebutting material it was treated as reliable evidence of the contractual arrangement. The record also indicated that the bags were not supplied free of cost. On that basis, the transaction was characterised as separate sales rather than a single composite sale, and the later amendment to the schedule was noted as reinforcing statutory recognition of separate treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>