https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181018 The Tripura High Court upheld the tax demand on rubber products purchased by the petitioner, requiring a deposit of 50% of the assessed amount within three months to proceed with the revision petition. The petitioner's failure to actively pursue the matter led to the court's directive for compliance, emphasizing the statutory obligation. The court also noted the petitioner's explanation for non-payment, leaving the final determination to the Commissioner after a hearing. en-us Tue, 02 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:01:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181018 The Tripura High Court upheld the tax demand on rubber products purchased by the petitioner, requiring a deposit of 50% of the assessed amount within three months to proceed with the revision petition. The petitioner's failure to actively pursue the matter led to the court's directive for compliance, emphasizing the statutory obligation. The court also noted the petitioner's explanation for non-payment, leaving the final determination to the Commissioner after a hearing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 02 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181018