<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 221 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326107</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the tax case appeal and connected CMP, emphasizing adherence to Circular No.1/2016 for deduction under Section 80IA. It highlighted the importance of following precedents and directives from the Central Board of Direct Taxes for consistency in tax assessments and urged resolution at higher judicial levels for definitive legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 221 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326107</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the tax case appeal and connected CMP, emphasizing adherence to Circular No.1/2016 for deduction under Section 80IA. It highlighted the importance of following precedents and directives from the Central Board of Direct Taxes for consistency in tax assessments and urged resolution at higher judicial levels for definitive legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>