<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 218 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326104</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the reopening of assessments beyond four years under the Income Tax Act. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer must consider all relevant information provided during scrutiny assessments. As there was no evidence of failure on the part of the Assessing Officer in conducting the assessments, the Court dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:00:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 218 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326104</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the reopening of assessments beyond four years under the Income Tax Act. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer must consider all relevant information provided during scrutiny assessments. As there was no evidence of failure on the part of the Assessing Officer in conducting the assessments, the Court dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>