<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 217 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326103</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that payments made to doctors were professional fees, not salaries, under the Income Tax Act. The relationship between the assessee and doctors was that of independent contractors, not employer-employee, as the doctors had autonomy in their services without direct control. The Court emphasized the importance of control and supervision in determining this distinction, consistent with previous rulings. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:00:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 217 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326103</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that payments made to doctors were professional fees, not salaries, under the Income Tax Act. The relationship between the assessee and doctors was that of independent contractors, not employer-employee, as the doctors had autonomy in their services without direct control. The Court emphasized the importance of control and supervision in determining this distinction, consistent with previous rulings. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>