<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that no penalty under section 271(1)(c) was imposable for the transfer pricing adjustments and the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). The decision was based on the good faith and due diligence of the assessee, the debatable nature of the transfer pricing issue, and procedural fairness in penalty initiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:00:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that no penalty under section 271(1)(c) was imposable for the transfer pricing adjustments and the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). The decision was based on the good faith and due diligence of the assessee, the debatable nature of the transfer pricing issue, and procedural fairness in penalty initiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>