<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 206 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326092</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, canceling the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) for all four years under consideration. The decision was based on the lack of discernible satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings, the voluntary nature of the income disclosure, and the applicability of immunity under Clause 2 of Explanation 5 to section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 206 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326092</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, canceling the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) for all four years under consideration. The decision was based on the lack of discernible satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings, the voluntary nature of the income disclosure, and the applicability of immunity under Clause 2 of Explanation 5 to section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>