<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 199 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326085</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for the remaining service tax liability and penalties during the appeal process, considering the legal uncertainties during the relevant period and lack of evidence of intentional evasion by the appellant. The decision emphasized the significance of legal clarity and evidence in determining tax liabilities and limitations, providing relief to the appellant based on the circumstances and subsequent legal developments clarifying tax payment on a reverse charge basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:58:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 199 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326085</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for the remaining service tax liability and penalties during the appeal process, considering the legal uncertainties during the relevant period and lack of evidence of intentional evasion by the appellant. The decision emphasized the significance of legal clarity and evidence in determining tax liabilities and limitations, providing relief to the appellant based on the circumstances and subsequent legal developments clarifying tax payment on a reverse charge basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>