https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326079 The appeal against the order allowing clearance of excisable goods under provisional assessment was disposed of. The court upheld the Single Judge's decision to grant the writ petition, directing the respondents to allow clearance under Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules. The conflict between the appeal before CESTAT and pending applications for provisional assessment was addressed, with directions given to the Deputy Commissioner to dispose of the applications within four weeks. The CESTAT was instructed to proceed independently with the appeal. The rights of the assessee under Rule 7 were emphasized throughout the judgment. en-us Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:58:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326079 The appeal against the order allowing clearance of excisable goods under provisional assessment was disposed of. The court upheld the Single Judge's decision to grant the writ petition, directing the respondents to allow clearance under Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules. The conflict between the appeal before CESTAT and pending applications for provisional assessment was addressed, with directions given to the Deputy Commissioner to dispose of the applications within four weeks. The CESTAT was instructed to proceed independently with the appeal. The rights of the assessee under Rule 7 were emphasized throughout the judgment. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326079