<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 192 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326078</link>
    <description>The government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) orders, confirming that rebate claims on exported goods are admissible only to the extent of duty paid at the effective rate, rejecting claims for goods cleared under total exemption. The applicant&#039;s arguments regarding the selection of duty payment notifications and re-credit of excess duty were dismissed. The government emphasized adherence to C.B.E. &amp;amp; C. Instructions and Supreme Court judgments, concluding that the revision applications lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 192 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326078</link>
      <description>The government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) orders, confirming that rebate claims on exported goods are admissible only to the extent of duty paid at the effective rate, rejecting claims for goods cleared under total exemption. The applicant&#039;s arguments regarding the selection of duty payment notifications and re-credit of excess duty were dismissed. The government emphasized adherence to C.B.E. &amp;amp; C. Instructions and Supreme Court judgments, concluding that the revision applications lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>