<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 191 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326077</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, determining that the three divisions of the company should be considered separate only from the date of issuance of separate Registration Certificates on 23.09.2009. The transfer and utilization of Cenvat Credit from one unit to the Assessee were deemed legal. The extended period of limitation for demanding duty was found inapplicable due to no intent to evade duty. Penalties on the Assessee and its authorized signatory were set aside as their actions were compliant with the law. The appeals were allowed, dismissing the demand for Cenvat Credit, interest, and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 191 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326077</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, determining that the three divisions of the company should be considered separate only from the date of issuance of separate Registration Certificates on 23.09.2009. The transfer and utilization of Cenvat Credit from one unit to the Assessee were deemed legal. The extended period of limitation for demanding duty was found inapplicable due to no intent to evade duty. Penalties on the Assessee and its authorized signatory were set aside as their actions were compliant with the law. The appeals were allowed, dismissing the demand for Cenvat Credit, interest, and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>