<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 188 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the classification of the juicer attachment under Heading 8509 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The decision emphasized the necessity of accurate classification based on the characteristics and components of the goods, as outlined in the relevant tariff and explanatory notes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 188 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the classification of the juicer attachment under Heading 8509 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The decision emphasized the necessity of accurate classification based on the characteristics and components of the goods, as outlined in the relevant tariff and explanatory notes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>