<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 180 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326066</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appellant&#039;s challenge to the prohibition order imposed by the Chennai Commissionerate under Regulation 23 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013. The court held that the penalty imposed by the Cochin Commissionerate did not restrict the Chennai Commissionerate&#039;s authority to prohibit further, emphasizing the distinct nature of Regulation 23&#039;s limited prohibition power. As the penalty order remained in force, the appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the prohibition order without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 180 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326066</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appellant&#039;s challenge to the prohibition order imposed by the Chennai Commissionerate under Regulation 23 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013. The court held that the penalty imposed by the Cochin Commissionerate did not restrict the Chennai Commissionerate&#039;s authority to prohibit further, emphasizing the distinct nature of Regulation 23&#039;s limited prohibition power. As the penalty order remained in force, the appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the prohibition order without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>