https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326060 Review jurisdiction was found to disclose no error apparent on the face of the record, and no other ground justifying interference with the final judgment dated 09.10.2015. After examining the review petitions and connected papers, the Court declined to reopen its earlier decision and dismissed the review petitions. The order records that the impugned judgment remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2016 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326060 Review jurisdiction was found to disclose no error apparent on the face of the record, and no other ground justifying interference with the final judgment dated 09.10.2015. After examining the review petitions and connected papers, the Court declined to reopen its earlier decision and dismissed the review petitions. The order records that the impugned judgment remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326060