<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 583 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181002</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner was entitled to interest on delayed payment of interest based on the Supreme Court precedent in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Narendra Doshi. The court set aside the previous order and directed the department to reconsider in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling. It emphasized the principle of consistency in legal interpretation, preventing the revenue from challenging a decision without just cause. The writ petition was allowed, and the department was instructed to comply with the law as per the Supreme Court decision, with a stay of the order&#039;s operation for three weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:33:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 583 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181002</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner was entitled to interest on delayed payment of interest based on the Supreme Court precedent in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Narendra Doshi. The court set aside the previous order and directed the department to reconsider in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling. It emphasized the principle of consistency in legal interpretation, preventing the revenue from challenging a decision without just cause. The writ petition was allowed, and the department was instructed to comply with the law as per the Supreme Court decision, with a stay of the order&#039;s operation for three weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>