<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 658 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180978</link>
    <description>Search and seizure material was analysed to determine whether loose, undated papers can ground additions for income from undisclosed sources. The note holds that only speaking documents reflecting complete transactions can sustain additions; non-speaking loose papers are inadmissible for making additions and cannot attract the statutory presumption arising from search provisions in assessment proceedings. Reopening of assessment is permissible where a direct nexus exists between material and formation of belief, and such reopenings were upheld. A clearly dated and detailed seized paper supporting unexplained investment was held admissible and sustained. Retrospective amendment removing the 12-month notice defect in reassessment was recognised and objections on that ground rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 658 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180978</link>
      <description>Search and seizure material was analysed to determine whether loose, undated papers can ground additions for income from undisclosed sources. The note holds that only speaking documents reflecting complete transactions can sustain additions; non-speaking loose papers are inadmissible for making additions and cannot attract the statutory presumption arising from search provisions in assessment proceedings. Reopening of assessment is permissible where a direct nexus exists between material and formation of belief, and such reopenings were upheld. A clearly dated and detailed seized paper supporting unexplained investment was held admissible and sustained. Retrospective amendment removing the 12-month notice defect in reassessment was recognised and objections on that ground rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>