https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180967 Title documents, revenue records and oral evidence were treated as sufficient to establish the plaintiff's title, while the Wakf notification and supporting references were found inadequate to prove long, continuous wakf ownership or a valid statutory enquiry with notice. The suit was held to satisfy the notice requirement because notice was averred, produced and supported by oral evidence, and non-production of postal acknowledgements was not treated as fatal. The one-year limitation bar under Section 6 was held inapplicable to a stranger in possession, and remand was refused because the defendants had already had a full opportunity to adduce evidence. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:13:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180967 Title documents, revenue records and oral evidence were treated as sufficient to establish the plaintiff's title, while the Wakf notification and supporting references were found inadequate to prove long, continuous wakf ownership or a valid statutory enquiry with notice. The suit was held to satisfy the notice requirement because notice was averred, produced and supported by oral evidence, and non-production of postal acknowledgements was not treated as fatal. The one-year limitation bar under Section 6 was held inapplicable to a stranger in possession, and remand was refused because the defendants had already had a full opportunity to adduce evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180967